Saturday, March 29, 2025

How Difficult Will It Be to Bring Goa Nightclub Owners Back from Thailand? A Look at India’s Top 5 Economic Fugitives

December 9, 2025 1:29 PM
Goa Club Case Update

How Difficult Will It Be to Bring Goa Nightclub Owners Back from Thailand? A Look at India’s Top 5 Economic Fugitives

New Delhi | December 9, 2025

The owners of Goa’s Birch Bay Romeo Lane nightclub fled India for Thailand within hours of a devastating fire at the venue that claimed 25 lives. Their sudden exit has raised a crucial question: how difficult will it be for Indian authorities to bring them back to face justice?

Nightclub Fire and Escape

A massive fire broke out at the Birch Bay Romeo Lane nightclub in Goa, resulting in the deaths of 25 people. Soon after the tragedy, the club’s owners, Gaurav Luthra and Saurabh Luthra, quietly left the country and escaped to Phuket, Thailand, a popular tourist destination. Their flight has sparked outrage and renewed debate about the challenges India faces in extraditing accused individuals from foreign countries.

Is Extradition from Thailand Possible?

Extraditing fugitives from another country is never easy. Accused individuals often approach local courts, seek asylum, or use legal loopholes to delay or block their return. However, in this case, India does have a legal pathway.

India and Thailand signed an extradition treaty in May 2013, during former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s official visit to Thailand. This treaty allows both countries to hand over individuals facing criminal charges. Legally, this makes extradition possible.

That said, there is a key procedural hurdle. The nightclub owners have not yet been formally declared fugitives. Declaring them as proclaimed offenders is the first essential step before India can formally initiate extradition proceedings. Only after this declaration can Indian authorities submit an official request to Thailand.

India’s Experience with Extradition

India has extradition treaties with around 50 countries, including Australia, Canada, France, Russia, Saudi Arabia, the UK, Switzerland, Malaysia, and South Africa. Despite these agreements, extradition often turns into a long-drawn legal battle.

In many cases, fugitives remain abroad for years due to appeals, health claims, or asylum petitions. Still, Indian agencies continue to pursue such cases, and in some instances, accused individuals have been brought back after prolonged legal efforts.

India’s Top Economic Fugitives

The nightclub case has once again drawn attention to India’s list of high-profile economic offenders. According to the government, 15 individuals have been declared fugitive economic offenders under the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018, causing losses of more than ₹57,000 crore to banks.

Here are some of the most prominent names:

  1. Vijay Mallya

    • Kingfisher Airlines case

    • ₹6,848 crore principal and ₹11,960 crore interest loss

    • Significant recovery already made, but extradition from the UK remains pending.

  2. Nirav Modi

    • Punjab National Bank fraud of ₹6,799 crore

    • Limited recovery so far; fighting extradition proceedings abroad.

  3. Mehul Choksi

    • Accused in the ₹13,500 crore PNB fraud

    • India is seeking his extradition from Belgium; the Belgian Supreme Court is hearing his appeal.

  4. Lalit Modi

    • Alleged irregularities during his tenure as IPL commissioner

    • Living in the UK since 2010, contesting Indian efforts to bring him back.

  5. Nitin Sandesara

    • Sterling Biotech banking fraud worth ₹5,700 crore

    • Declared a fugitive economic offender; fled via Dubai to Nigeria.

Other accused linked to major financial crimes include Chetan Sandesara, Dipti Sandesara, H. Tesh Kumar Patel, Sudarshan Venkataraman, and Ramanjam Sesharatnam.

What Lies Ahead

While India’s extradition treaty with Thailand provides legal ground to seek the return of the Goa nightclub owners, the process is likely to be complex and time-consuming. Much will depend on how quickly Indian authorities declare them fugitives, file formal requests, and counter any legal resistance mounted in Thai courts.

For now, the case stands as yet another reminder of the difficulties India faces in ensuring accountability when accused individuals flee overseas.

Have something to say? Post your comment